When it comes to cut-resistant materials, understanding the standards that govern their ratings is crucial for ensuring safety. The two main standards globally recognized for evaluating cut resistance are the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the European Standard EN 388. Both standards use different methods and scales to assess and report the cut resistance of materials, primarily used in safety gloves but applicable to any cut-resistant fabric.

ANSI/ISEA 105: 2016 Standard

The ANSI/ISEA 105: 2016 standard, based on the ASTM F2992-15 testing method, assesses cut resistance on a nine-level scale, ranging from A1 to A9. The test involves using a tomodynamometer (TDM) machine, which pulls a blade across the material under varying gram loads to determine the force needed to cut through it. The results are measured in grams of weight needed to achieve a cut-through, providing a precise and accurate assessment of the material's cut resistance​​.

EN 388: 2016 Standard

On the other hand, the EN 388: 2016 standard employs two testing methods: the Coupe Test and the ISO 13997. The Coupe Test uses a rotating circular blade under a fixed weight to measure how many cycles it takes to cut through the material, scoring it between 0 and 5. However, for highly cut-resistant materials, the blade can dull, resulting in inaccurate scores. To address this, the EN 388 standard incorporates the ISO 13997 method, which uses the same TDM machine as the ANSI standard but measures the force in Newtons, categorized from levels A to F​.

Key Differences

Testing Methods:

ANSI: Uses the TDM machine exclusively, providing results in grams (A1-A9).

EN 388: Uses both the Coupe Test for lower levels and the TDM machine (ISO 13997) for higher levels, reporting in Newtons (A-F).

Measurement Units:

ANSI: Grams of force needed to cut through the material.

EN 388: Newtons of force needed to cut through the material.

Application:

ANSI: Primarily used in North America, offering a detailed nine-level scale.

EN 388: Used globally, especially in Europe, providing a combined approach with two different scales for better accuracy.

Rating Systems:

ANSI: Ranges from A1 (200 grams) to A9 (over 6000 grams).

EN 388: Ranges from A (2 Newtons) to F (30 Newtons)​.

Why Choose Titan Battlegear’s Cut-Resistant Shirt?

When selecting cut-resistant gear, especially for high-risk sports like hockey, it’s essential to opt for the highest protection available. Titan Battlegear’s cut-resistant shirts with integrated neck and wrist guards utilize the revolutionary TITANOTEX™ fabric, which incorporates graphene. This fabric is not only 200 times stronger than steel but also provides unmatched cut resistance, ensuring that our shirts meet the highest standards of protection.

Graphene’s properties, such as superior cut resistance, thermal regulation, and antibacterial qualities, make our hockey shirts the safest choice for athletes. By adhering to both ANSI and EN 388 standards, Titan Battlegear ensures that our products offer unparalleled defense against slashes and cuts, keeping you safe and comfortable on the ice.

Explore our cut-resistant battlegear collection and experience the ultimate protection and performance with Titan Battlegear.

Latest Stories

View all

Titan BattleGear vs. Warroad Hockey Neck Guards

Titan BattleGear vs. Warroad Hockey Neck Guards

Warroad is known for sleek designs and lifestyle appeal, but how does it hold up under pressure? In this comprehensive review, we compare Titan BattleGear vs. Warroad across cut resistance, neck and wrist coverage, fit, customization, and price. This guide will help you separate style from substance to find the safest, most functional gear on the market.

Read more

Titan BattleGear vs. Bauer Hockey Neck Guards

Titan BattleGear vs. Bauer Hockey Neck Guards

Bauer may be the most recognized name in hockey gear, but does it deliver the safety today’s players need? In this deep dive, we compare Bauer’s neck guard shirts to Titan BattleGear across critical categories like cut resistance, comfort, coverage, and sustainability. If you're deciding between tradition and innovation, this review will help you make the call – with no fluff, just facts.

Read more

Titan BattleGear vs. CCM Hockey Neck Guards

Titan BattleGear vs. CCM Hockey Neck Guards

CCM is a staple in hockey gear – but when it comes to neck protection, does it keep up with new innovations? We put Titan BattleGear and CCM neck guard shirts head-to-head across the metrics that matter most: cut resistance, coverage, comfort, materials, customization, and sustainability. This in-depth comparison breaks down the differences to help you choose the safest and most high-performing neck guard.

Read more

Titan BattleGear vs. Shock Doctor Hockey Neck Guards

Titan BattleGear vs. Shock Doctor Hockey Neck Guards

Shock Doctor might be a leader in mouthguards, but how does their neck guard shirt hold up in real hockey conditions? In this no-holds-barred review, we compare Titan BattleGear vs. Shock Doctor on cut resistance, protection, comfort, fit, and materials. If you’re wondering whether Shock Doctor’s lower price is worth the trade-offs in safety, this guide gives you the facts – no spin, just side-by-side performance.

Read more

Chris calls Titan BattleGear “godly”

Chris calls Titan BattleGear “godly”

Chris didn’t grow up playing organized hockey. Buwhen he finally hit the ice, he went all in. Now captain of Moose Lightning, a beer league team he helped build from scratch, Chris credits Titan BattleGear with helping him play fearless, look sharp, stay protected, and feel "godly."

Read more

Stick taps & snapshots: meet Ace & Matt

Stick taps & snapshots: meet Ace & Matt

Meet Ace – a high-energy youth player who tapes his own stick, knows his favorite shot, and takes neck safety seriously. Alongside his dad Matt, a beer league defenseman and devoted hockey parent, they share why Titan BattleGear is the only gear they trust on the ice.

Read more

The Mayo Clinic put hockey neck guards to the test – and most failed

The Mayo Clinic put hockey neck guards to the test – and most failed

A Mayo Clinic study put popular hockey neck guards to the test – and the results were alarming. Most guards failed to stop a skate blade at real-game impact levels. The only ones that held up were those made with advanced materials rated ANSI A6 or higher. Here’s why that matters, and how this very study helped spark the creation of Titan.

Read more

Retailers: it’s time to rethink hockey neck guards

Retailers: it’s time to rethink hockey neck guards

Looking to carry hockey gear that players actually ask for by name? Titan BattleGear is redefining protection with bold, cut-resistant base layers that blend elite safety, serious comfort, and undeniable style. Find out why pro shops across North America are making the switch.

Read more